On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:41:29 +0100 Per Jessen <p...@computer.org> wrote:
> Christian Brel wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:39:43 +0100 > > "Rob Sterenborg" <r.sterenb...@netsourcing.nl> wrote: > > > >> On 2010-02-24, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > >> > >> > > Postfix: I would have two different smtpd daemons - one for > >> > >> > You don't have to run two postfixes for this. > >> > >> I think Per means: 2 smtpd processes, not 2 Postfixes.. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Rob > >> > > > > Humour me. Does this not mean a need to change the outbound to > > either a different IP or port? > > IP yes. I assume your external and internal network are on different > IP-ranges. What about my home workers? I don't have a VPN, they hook in by DSL from any number of different providers from outside using SASL/TLS. It's like you say, you were thinking out loud and I can see where you are coming from, but it's not a fix for every situation. I'm also thinking about those forwarding services out there - does the two SMTPd approach not break this in the same way SPF would break if the forwarder was not permitted to send? >
