On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On man 01 mar 2010 02:37:37 CET, John Hardin wrote
I've suggested this before, but the current position appears to be "if the
MUA doesn't display it automatically, why should we scan it?"
same goes for "just enter this url" when the sender was tired of doing it
right, fuzzyocr solved this
Justin, I would respectfully suggest this may no longer be a reasonable
position, at least for plain text and HTML attachments...
+1
Please correct me if I've misunderstood.
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg64449.html
That doesn't answer the question of whether I misunderstood the position
Justin was taking on attachments.
Jonas, what's the current status of that plugin? It looks pretty stable to
me. And, can it extract from basic text attachments? I assume so...
extracttext_external text {CS:UTF-8} /bin/cat -
extracttext_use text .txt .htm .html text/(?:plain|html)
?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have to realize that people who run the government can and do
change. Our society and laws must assume that bad people -
criminals even - will run the government, at least part of the
time. -- John Gilmore
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
13 days until Albert Einstein's 131st Birthday
