Hi On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:35 AM, tonjg <t...@freeuk.com> wrote: > > it's not 'a' spam I'm referring to, it lots of different spams getting > through to my inbox with only 40% of them being identified as spam.
Yes, that's awful, I would be killed if that many spams got though our filters .... What rules does the mails hit? Not even a standard system with default rules, when sa-update have been run have such a bad catch rate .... unless you maybe only got hit by very rare spam mails. Does it help when you sa-learn the spams ? Does it change the BAYES_ score for that mail ? So there must to something that is not configured right ... so please post what rules it hit, that way its easier for us to help ... DNS available? >This strikes me as a poor success rate. What do you mean by 'crappy mail >bayes' ? > the bayes learn was done on spam and ham that ended up in my inbox. Needs to be all kinds of spam and ham ... but I guess thats in place. > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/bayes%2C-numbers-of-tokens-and-performance-tp27940005p27940352.html > Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > muh Mikael Syska
