On 5.5.2010 17:39, Kris Deugau wrote: > Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> On 5.5.2010 15:38, Alans wrote: >>> We are about to close port 25 and tell customers to switch to our >>> smtp relay >>> and scan it with spamassasin (I still don't know if possible or no!). >>> >>> We want to reject all spam emails and send notification back to >>> sender about >>> his/her activity. >> >> There is one special group that will suffer from that decision: namely >> SpamAssassin users within your network. >> >> If they do report their spam to SpamCop using SpamAssassin's own report >> mechanism, they are screwed. SA does not AFAIK support smart host >> configuration, but sends directly to SpamCop. And if it did, and used >> your SMTP relay, the report might be stopped by your own SA check! >> >> This group is a minority, but it is where I am. > > *blink* *scratch head* Can you expand on the feedback cycle causing > problems for you? It sounds like something that might cause problems > here, but I haven't seen any indication it *has* happened. >
? If my SA sends an email to SpamCop with a spam as an attachment, and that gets rejected by my ISP and a feedback sent to me.. it would be a problem. To me. -- http://www.iki.fi/jarif/ Civilization is the limitless multiplication of unnecessary necessities. -- Mark Twain
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
