No. It is logically impossible, that an additional negative score *causes* the FPs.
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 21:31 +0800, Lauro Costa G. Borges wrote: > I configured some addresses to be -9.0 or even -20.0 on Amavis (there > were some addresses with -3.0, from default config on Ubuntu), does Err, what exactly did you configure? > that make it possible that SpamAssassin will mark some emails with a > pontuation higher than they should be, or were in the past (since -9 > and -20 are far from -3)? I have users being blocked, and these users > were not blocked before, simple messages with Office and such > attachments, or links, are being banned, identified as spam, with > scores around 5 and 6. There is no way for us to help you and spot the issue, unless you provide headers. At the very least, the SA rules triggered by these messages. A quick guess though is, you did *not* run sa-update in the past few months, and now suffer from a buggy rule adding a few points to each and every message. Again: Please do show us the headers (or rules triggered) of these messages. guenther -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}