Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > apparently not enough of NDRs. I trained bayes with many notices and it > was > able to detect as expected then. > It apparently does learn the ndrs given, but as we send a newsletter from time to time (that produces ndrs as well), Bayes seems to learn ndrs as ham continuously.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > BAYES_99 and CHARSET_FARAWAY together should score enough to score as > spam. > *BOUNCE_MESSAGE score only 0.1 and rising them is not safe. > Is it such a bad idea to rise the score? Or is the general purpose to combine it with some sort of meta? By the way, is it possible to rescore or disable one rule, if another already hit (thought on something like disabling bayes when BOUNCE_MESSAGE already hit)? This way I could disable Bayes when BOUNCE_MESSAGE already hit. Yeah I know that's kind of bogus config but it'd be very suitable for our purpose. Daniel -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Is-there-a-way-to-block-%22invalid%22-non-delivery-notifications--tp29032307p29056475.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
