Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: > > I guess the subject is incorrect. You are indeed running 3.2.3. ;) > > Upgraded, you just said. In previous posts you said "installed". That > makes a difference. > > How did you install 3.3? Given the Perl module dependency issues you > mentioned, I guess via CPAN. Did you uninstall 3.2? Nope... > >
Hmmm....thanks for your reply Karsten. I already had v3.2.3 running on the system, so I thought was upgrading! I followed the instructions on the "Upgrading to the latest version" page (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UpgradingVersion) which suggested installing by CPAN to upgrade so that's what I did (I didn't think I was being foolish!!). No I didn't uninstall 3.2.3 - I didn't know I was supposed to. Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: > > > Restarted spamd *how*? Using the same old init script? > > Yes, executed /etc/init.d/spamd restart (again I didn't think I was being foolish!) Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: > > > The init script most likely calls spamd, where it has been installed > previously. The new 3.3 install probably uses a different prefix, and > thus is not used by the init script. > > Also keep in mind, your $PATH likely uses a different order to find > something like sa-update or sa-learn, than Perl uses to pick up its > M::SA module. > > You're getting beyond the limit of my knowledge here. Is there an idiots guide that you could point me to inorder to try and work through your suggestions? Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: > > > What does 'spamd --version' report? What about 'which spamd'? What about > finding all spamd executable scripts on your system? > > If I just issue a spamd --version at the bash prompt, it does report back as SpamAssassin Server version 3.3.1 and as to which spamd, I seem to have 3: /user/bin/spamd /user/sbin/spamd and also /use/bin/X11/spamd However, I guess I'm now confused as to why spamc is calling the old spamd (v3.2.3) when if I issue spamd from a bash prompt it uses the new one (v3.3.1). Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: > > >> So why am I getting 3.2.3 still in the header of newly received mails? > > Because... it is actually running. :) > > New I avoid upgrading for a reason. Can you offer any suggestion as to what I should do next to sort the mess I've created out? Thanks, David -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/X-Spam-Version-Checker-reports-3.2.3-but-running-3.3.1---Why--tp29351374p29351627.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
