On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 15:32 -0700, Happy Chap wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
> > Uninstalling the old version (Installed by distro packages, right!? You
> > never confirmed this.) would be a very good idea. But beware, if both
> > versions actually share some prefix and thus files, you might end up
> > with some crucial bits removed by the package manager, which have been
> > overwritten by the CPAN install. If so, after uninstalling the old,
> > definitely do re-install the new.
>
> Maybe I'll just delete the old spamd executable in /usr/sbin so it can't be
> called by mistake rather than risking breaking any dependencies.
No distro provided RPM package for SA possibly can be a dependency. Just
don't also uninstall their dependencies, like Perl Modules.
> Yes, I did run sa-update after installing the 3.3 version (I read that in
> the change log - so I do try and follow the guides, it just didn't say don't
> install from CPAN if you have a distro version!) and I do have
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001 as well. I guess I can just delete the
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002003 now as well as that should be being used
> anymore?
Yes, the 3.002003 one can be removed, if you are actually running SA 3.3
spamd.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
