> Hi all, > > Recently I've noticed that a lot of spam that I am getting is not > caught by > SpamAssassin, despite the fact that it is very similar to other spam I > got and > that I marked as spam using the Bayesian training. I've placed a sample > of > some of the recent messagess I got here: > > http://www.shlomifish.org/sa-uncaught-spam/ > > A lot of it is "I want to have a relationship with you, please contact > me so I > can send you my picture, etc.". > > I've also noticed that the latest version of SpamAssassin, 3.3.1, was > released > on 20-March-2010, which is quite a long time ago: > > http://freshmeat.net/projects/spamassassin/ > > Is there a new release planned soon?
I don't believe a new SA release would be of any help. Most of the message in your set hit BAYES_99 on my system. The X-Spam-Status of some of the messages in your set, reports that you enabled the autolearning facility, and that it has Learnt the message as ham. This may be the why you have so low Bayes hits. I would suggest to revise the Bayes autolearn thresholds in you SA setup. > > Regards, > > Shlomi Fish > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ > Understand what Open Source is - http://shlom.in/oss-fs > > God considered inflicting XSLT as the tenth plague of Egypt, but then > decided against it because he thought it would be too evil. > > Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - > http://shlom.in/reply .
