On Sunday 22 August 2010 12:55:43 Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> > I cannot find any special setting for autolearn (either
> > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam or
> > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam ) in either
> > /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf or
> > ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs . It probably means they are the default
> > which is
> > 0.1 and 12.0 respectively which seems reasonable enough.
>
> In your set, these are the scores of your ham-learnt messages:
>
> 1282213227.7828.1nhON:2,S 0.8
> 1282213227.7828.AHPct:2,S 0.8
> 1282213227.7828.CQy9k:2,S 0.8
> 1282213227.7828.VLBN5:2,S -2.0
> 1282213227.7828.zvzWO:2,S 0.8
>
> Since they score 0.8, they wouldn't be learnt as ham with the default
> bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam value. So, probably at least this
> setting had been overridden somewhere in your SA conf...
>
> Also, since most of the above messages hit BAYES_50, I would say you have
> network tests disabled in your setup.
>
> If this is the case, I would suggest to either:
>
> 1) enable and appropriately configure network test, because they may help
> SA to better classify your messages;
>
> 2) revise the default auto-learn threshold. Most of the SA user base
> nowadays uses network test, which means that the default auto-learn
> thresholds may reflect the wider spam-to-ham score spread this case yields.
>
> Also note 1282213227.7828.VLBN5:2,S : is it really spam? Revise you ham
> corpora: isn't there any spam?
>
This email reads:
{{{
Subject: Site suggestion: www.careerjet.co.il
}}}
I've classified it as spam because it appears to be one of the many link
requests that I've been getting and which I don't really want.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
Understand what Open Source is - http://shlom.in/oss-fs
God considered inflicting XSLT as the tenth plague of Egypt, but then
decided against it because he thought it would be too evil.
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
