On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 13:13 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On fre 24 sep 2010 04:33:33 CEST, Chris wrote > > Or is it needed since I have the def_whitelist_from_spf line? > > you trigger on def_ in shourtcicuit thats the error you made if any, > do change the shortcicuit rule to only doit it if its whilelist not > just def_whitelist > > def_ rules is for grey domains that sometimes sends spam or 50 % 50 of > spam and ham but newer only ham > > show me your shurtcicuit rule if still unsure what failed >
# slower, network-based whitelisting meta SC_NET_HAM (USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST||USER_IN_DK_WHITELIST|| USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST||USER_IN_DEF_DK_WL||USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL|| USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL||USER_IN_WHITELIST||USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST) priority SC_NET_HAM -500 shortcircuit SC_NET_HAM ham score SC_NET_HAM -20 Then I have this: whitelist_from_SPF *...@embarqmail.com def_whitelist_from_dkim *...@embarqmail.com def_whitelist_from_spf *...@embarqmail.com Here's what rules hit in a short circuit ham: X-spam-status: No, score=-124.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_PBL=3.335, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.001,SC_NET_HAM=-20,SHORTCIRCUIT=-100, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5 RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,SC_NET_HAM, SHORTCIRCUIT,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL shortcircuit=ham Chris -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
