On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 04:47:31 +0200 Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.org> wrote:
> On lør 25 sep 2010 02:53:30 CEST, Chris wrote > > meta SC_NET_HAM (USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST||USER_IN_DK_WHITELIST|| > > USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST||USER_IN_DEF_DK_WL||USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL|| > > USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL||USER_IN_WHITELIST) > > there is still user in def :=) > > user_in_whitelist includes whitelist_from with can be forged, my fav > to be removed if i just can convence more devs :) I don't see the point. If someone has chosen to use whitelist_from, that's their choice - probably based on their experience that it doesn't get spoofed. Bypassing short-circuiting just wastes cpu-cycles in the vain hope of a spam picking-up the +105 points needed to balance-out the -100.
