On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:35:11 -0500 Jason Bertoch <ja...@i6ix.com> wrote:
> After many complaints from the DNS community over SPF "hijacking" the > TXT record, a new SPF record type was eventually accepted. The proper fix would have been to make SPF lookups for "example.com" request the TXT record for "_spf.example.com" I guess it's way too late for that now. :( A whole new record type for a technology of dubious utility seems silly to me. Regards, David.
