Hi,

I have two machines that contain spamassassin.

On first machine(this is an old installation, 2-3 months old ), I had installed 
Spamassassin(3.3.1) from rpmforge repository by using yum (followed 
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd) , while on the second I had manually 
installed Spamassassin(3.3.1, 1 week old installation) by using spamassassin 
rpm.

Following are the spam headers of a same email that I send to both servers and 
I am getting different spam scores,
I want to know why?

First machine:(Spamassassin 3.3.1, old installation, 2-3 months old )

"X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.269 tag=-999 tag2=6.9 kill=6.9 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8,
 DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5,
 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.886, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.922,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01, URIBL_JP_SURBL=1.25] autolearn=no"

Second Machine:(Spamassassin 3.3.1, new installation, 1 week old )

"X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.859 tag=-999 tag2=6.9 kill=6.9
 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01, URIBL_JP_SURBL=1.948]
 autolearn=no"


As can be seen BAYES and RAZOR2 rules are not getting hit in new installation, 
but logs show the modules are getting loaded fine. 

Can anybody give me some idea of this kind of behavior?

Thanks in advance
Ashish Sharma

Reply via email to