Benny, Thanks for the reply.
But what about the Razor2 rules not getting hit? Any suggestions on that? Thanks Ashish Sharma -----Original Message----- From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:m...@junc.org] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 5:14 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Difference in spam score for seperate email machines with same version of Spamassassin On søn 28 nov 2010 12:22:55 CET, "Sharma, Ashish" wrote > Can anybody give me some idea of this kind of behavior? its well dokumented that bayes needs training, if no training is done it takes time to autolearn it, ask same question in 90 days and problem might at that time be gone :) if bayes at that time does not work lets take it from there options to consider from your server is, do i need manuel training ? spam evolves much in 90 days time, so unless you have 180 days of good coorpus to train from it will be pointless to help bayes do the right thing -- xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
