Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> >> Michelle Konzack wrote: >> >> > 300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks >> >> > worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it >> >> > terrorism. >> > >> > On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote: >> >> Just reject them all? > >> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> > Do those invitations contain headers by whose they could be >> > detected and that would prevent them to be passed to mailing lists? > > On 13.12.10 09:55, Per Jessen wrote: >> Yep. The mailing list operator could just reject everything coming >> from/via "mem...@linkedin.com" (that is my most recent invitation >> came from). Of course, the real issue is probably lists that don't >> require subscription. > > No. Such mails should contain something that would not be re-sent to > any kind of mailing lists, such a Precedence: or similar headers, so > the list operator should not be required to do anything.
AFAICT, there is no resending involved here. linkedin (and others) is given a long list of addresses to which to send inviattions. Linkedin can't determine that an address is a list-address, so isn't it only the list manager that can reject such invitations? /Per Jessen, Zürich
