On 24/02/2011 21:30, Dominic Benson wrote:
If a mail service is private then they can do what the hell they like, it might not be fully SMTP compliant, but then again, if it is a private mail service they are under no obligation to follow any rules.On 24 Feb 2011, at 20:01, Michelle Konzack wrote:Hello Mahmoud Khonji, Am 2011-02-23 23:03:46, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:A sending mail server should accept ab...@example.com, and number ofThis is wrong because, only public ISP offering MAILSERVICES must have an<abuse> addresses. The only one required, is the<postmaster> which is clearly writte in the RFCs.That's at best debatable. The mail services certainly don't have to be completely public; an organisation should accept abuse reports relating to e.g. mail sent by employees. In fact, you can argue that if *anyone* other than the person who would read abuse@ is using the service, it applies.
-- Best Regards, Giles Coochey NetSecSpec Ltd NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086 NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131 GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693 Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net Skype: gilescoochey
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature