On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 15:30 -0300, Christian Grunfeld wrote: > >> *check spam folder always > > > > Well, if I have to do *that*, I might as well not do any filtering at all. > > The whole purpose of anti-spam software is to shield me from spam. > > Not 100% correct. Now I always check spam folder, dont you?
never, because I trust our SA and local rules > Do you advise your people not to check spam folders? Are you 100% sure > that machines can sort 100% efectively what is spam and what is not? > its up to them if they want to or not, the spam folders have very little in them here because of our approach, and in our tests we have had 0.00000001% of FP's in that, which is really good. > >> Here you round the trip and legitimate the sender ! > > > > Which sender? The envelope sender? The From: header sender? The > > Reply-To: sender? Or the Sender: sender? > > well the From: header is what users see and trust. They do not know > about any other sender information I guess those that actually do check spam folders only look at the displayed name in the run down list (without going into any of the spams), we also replace the subject with just "[spam] attached" meaning all those dropkick deadhead spammers who put their spam in subject line waste their time as it never gets seen, so on whole I guess the users ignore any names they dont recognise, our system auto deletes spam after 7 days, the spam folders never contribute to any quotas so its a win-win for our users.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
