John Hardin wrote: > I wasn't aware that autolearning could do a cold-start of Bayes, can > anyone confirm whether this is the case?
If you let it run long enough to pass the 200/200 ham/spam thresholds, yes; there's no distinction I've ever met about where the learning came from. That said, I wouldn't trust a pure autolearn setup with stock autolearn thresholds - all too much spam will get learned scoring under 0.1. :( -kgd
