On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 8/15/2012 5:18 PM, John Hardin wrote:
I might not go so far as to say autolearn should be disabled by default,
as it is a major good if well trained; but setting the defaults extreme
enough that it is reliably, if slowly, initially trained seems to me a
fair middle ground. Setting the ham default threshold to -3 or even -5
seems prudent (_much_ better than the current 0.1), then someone who
actually wants to configure it can adjust based on how well it's
performing and whether they want autolearn on at all.
Can you open a bug about that and let's see if we can get that done? I agree
that a slower training threshold makes sense.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6828
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Today: the 67th anniversary of the end of World War II
