30.12.2012 17:48, RW kirjoitti: > On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:43:53 +0200 > Jari Fredriksson wrote: > >> I receive tons of spam currently on one mailing list. The list post >> has following features >> >> - sender gets negative points because it is listed in DNSWL_MED > It's Redhat that's in DNSWL_MED - consider putting them in your > trusted network to prevent that.
Red Had is the originator of the emails! They probably have some kind
of Web UI for the mailing list, the first received header is from
redhat.com.
>
>> - the email is in html and has lots of tokens similar in spam and ham.
>> Bayes training is slow and seems futile
> In most unix mailing lists anything in HTML is very likely spam anyway.
> Assigning a few points to a meta of HTML_MESSAGE and the list-id might
> take you most of the way to catching this.
There is no plain text mail from that ML. All come in HTML, from "Some
user name" no-re...@redhat.com...
That way I would put the whole list to spam bucket..
>> The spam has very common patterns, and contains lots of words that I
>> would like to ban from that one List-Id.
> The very common patterns sound more useful than the words.
>
>> So far I have created many meta rules containing those words, but the
>> list is endless. The words like mostly U.S. town names and U.S. sports
>> team names.
> On the face of it that doesn't sound too difficult.
>
>> In addition to that the spam contains words "game",
>> "basketball", "football", "live", "vs.", "at", "tv" and "pc".
> That sounds really error prone - particularly the last five words.
>
>> The list maintainer seems not to get them out, spam flow is
>> continuous.
>>
>> The rules would be much cleaner if the banned words would be in a flat
>> file or such, maintaining the lists would be easier.
>>
>> Is there such plugin already?
>
> It doesn't seem like a very good idea, but if you really want to do
> that you could use the flat-file to autogenerate an "in list" rule in
> its own .cf file.
>
>
--
Q: Why is Poland just like the United States?
A: In the United States you can't buy anything for zlotys and in
Poland you can't either, while in the U.S. you can get whatever
you want for dollars, just as you can in Poland.
-- being told in Poland, 1987
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
