Kevin A. McGrail wrote
> On 8/4/2014 4:02 PM, RobertGrimes wrote:
>> I just got a new message that scored 0 - here are the headers put in:
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on server
>> X-Spam-Level:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0
>> tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,
>> URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
>>
>> I saved the messaged from outlook and ran spamc and got a score of 7.3
>> with
>> the headers of:
>>
>> Received: from localhost by server
>>          with SpamAssassin (version 3.4.0);
>>          Mon, 04 Aug 2014 12:56:46 -0700
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on server
>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
>> X-Spam-Level: *******
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.3 required=5.0
>> tests=MISSING_DATE,MISSING_FROM,
>>         
>> MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MID,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_HEADERS_MESSAGE,NO_RECEIVED,
>>          NO_RELAYS,NULL_IN_BODY,URIBL_BLOCKED,URI_HEX autolearn=no
>> autolearn_force=no
>>          version=3.4.0
>>
>> both should be running under the same administrator account. Obviously
>> something is amiss but where do I start looking. I believe the high score
>> as
>> the message surely is spam.
> First, I'm not sure the format of the email you are retesting is the 
> same as the initial test.  Put some samples at pastebin.com
> 
> Second, you are getting blocked by URIBL.  This usually means you have 
> either a high volume of mail or you aren't using your own local caching 
> nameserver.
> 
> Regards,
> KAM

Volume should not be an issue. I get a few emails per hour. This is a
private email server. Since it is small, I don't have a local caching
nameserver. However, why would not having a local nameserver make a
difference between spamd via hMailServer and spamc?

Could you tell me how to put a binary file on pastebin.com? I don't see any
directions for binary files. Thanks.



--
View this message in context: 
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/New-at-SpamAssassin-how-to-not-get-headers-tp110712p110724.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to