On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 13:02 -0700, Robert Grimes wrote:
> Robert Grimes wrote
> > I have changed the user that runs the spamd service to be the same as when
> > I ran from command line. I will see what, if any changes occur. I will
> > leave Bayes alone for the moment; just try one thing at a time to keep the
> > confusion down.
By that change of the user your spamd service runs as, you lost your
previous Bayes training (which seems to be linked to the service user).
Unless you deliberately nuked the Bayes DB to start fresh.
Ignoring DNSBL blocking and broken format, which has been covered
already.
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,
> URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
There is no BAYES_xx rule hit. If Bayes is enabled and has been trained
sufficiently, there will *always* be a BAYES_xx rule indicating the
Bayesian probability of being spam.
The absence of any such rule since you changed the spamd service user
means, that user has no access to the previously trained Bayes DB.
> I saved the messaged from outlook and ran spamc [...]
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.3 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_DATE,MISSING_FROM,
>
> MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MID,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_HEADERS_MESSAGE,NO_RECEIVED,
> NO_RELAYS,NULL_IN_BODY,URIBL_BLOCKED,URI_HEX autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
> version=3.4.0
No BAYES_xx rule either, same problem as above.
However, do note the autolearn=no part. Bayes is enabled (just not
sufficiently trained yet). In a follow-up to this thread, you pasted
headers of spam manually scanned with spamc, showing autolearn=ham.
A spam message incorrectly has been learned as ham. You want to correct
that by re-training (simply learn as spam). And keep an eye on that part
in future.
> both should be running under the same administrator account.
It is important to use the same user (a) scanning incoming mail, and
(b) using for training as well as (c) manually running through spamc
later.
Unless spamd changes user on a per-recipient basis (which it seems is
not the case in your setup), that's a single user. Changing that user as
you just did, requires moving $HOME data or changing ownership for the
Bayes DB.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
