Am 16.09.2014 um 17:11 schrieb RW: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:07:47 +0200 > Reindl Harald wrote: > >> in that case not, but depends on some wired HTML, bad chosen >> subject or so hit another rule where 2 points penalty may >> come closer to spam, keep in mind nobody knows how good or >> bad a bayes on the RCPT side maybe trained >> >> what alarmed me was not that our SA in that specific case >> had -1 and not -3 but that a message with a header added >> by good intentions get a high penalty in general > > Very little of my own mail with unsubscribe headers would FP on > LIST_PARTIAL because practically all of it has DKIM > > __LIST_PARTIAL && !__BUGGED_IMG && !__DKIM_EXISTS && !__RP_MATCHES_RCVD && > !__HAS_SENDER
well, no DKIM here for now, too many domains and servers to implement that without take care and time, but SPF_PASS as said: i added the List-ID with "Newsletter <newsletter.domain.tld>" to prevent get that score on other destinations using SA BEFORE: -1 BAYES_00,CUST_DNSWL_8,HTML_MESSAGE,LIST_PARTIAL,SPF_PASS NOW: -3 BAYES_00,CUST_DNSWL_8,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
