On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:42 , Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme: >> [SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me >> You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SPAM] tag is being used because >> of a content filter and not simply a tag to identify the name of the list > > it is the *default* tag for a lot of commercial spamfilters > if a message was detected as spam but not high enough to drop
Those are very stupid filters then. Let me guess, the shitpile that is Barracuda? Honestly, shitpile implies a much higher value than I believe Barracuda has, at leas t ahit pile can be used to fertilize. > there is a reason why i had that sieve-filter and i saw > that tagging over many years from a lot of other users > not only the one with Barracuda Networks products You should never filter on Subject. Period. -- "A musicologist is a man who can read music but can't hear it." - Sir Thomas Beecham (1879 - 1961)
