On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:06:42 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, RW wrote: > > > I don't see why it's not auto generated - perhaps with a cap of 1.5. > > How long are signatures kept in the DCC database? Masscheck uses a > corpus that covers a couple of years. If the DCC signatures expire > within a month or two then that would skew the masscheck results > towards "DCC doesn't hit much".
The same thing applies to any net rule. I'd assumed that cached results would be used, I thought that's what the reuse flag was was for.
