I'm not finding the rule hitting very much here.And it doesn't appear to be very high volume looking at http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20150419-r1674595-n/RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP/detail but the S/O is high.
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Dianne Skoll
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Axb
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Reindl Harald
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP John Hardin
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Benny Pedersen
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Reindl Harald
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Benny Pedersen
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Axb
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Reindl Harald
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Dianne Skoll
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Axb
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP RW
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP shanew
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP John Hardin
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Mark Martinec
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Dianne Skoll
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Mark Martinec
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Martin Gregorie
- Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Mark Martinec