On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, sha...@shanew.net wrote:
I'm also happy to know there's some discussion going on with MS. When I mentioned it to an MS friend of mine last week he didn't seem particularly shocked that the "internal" headers wouldn't comply with expectations, but he also seemed surprised that anyone was looking at such headers as a way of determining spam.
Unfortunately it's rather difficult to determine whether the Received headers external to the local network are in somebody else's local network.
I suggest that this rule should treat 0/8 as equivalent to 127/8. That's essentially what it's reserved for, just "local to the LAN" vs. "local to the host".
-- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- USMC Rules of Gunfighting #2: Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Ammo is cheap. Your life is expensive. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 days until Max Planck's 157th birthday
