> On 21.04.15 14:08, Mark Martinec wrote:
> >In any case, I think that RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP should not be adding
> >score points if it sees an 0.0.0.0/8 address in a Received header
> >field.
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:56:27 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Why not? Should not it depend mostly on what masscheck say?
On 21.04.15 15:15, RW wrote:
The reason is that the FPs are on 0/8, which is only a small part of
the total address space.
I meant, of the total address space that RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP currently
hits.
what if Microsoft starts using other IP range tested by RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
