W dniu 2015-05-05 o 21:28, Reindl Harald pisze:
> 
> 
> Am 05.05.2015 um 21:21 schrieb Marcin Mirosław:
>> Thanks for both answers. I'll try to describe it using ascii art:
>> ------------------------------            --------------------------
>> |random user sending email   |sends email |89.161.182.208 from this |
>> |(in my case: 31.61.129.221) |----------->|MTA I'm getting email    |
>> ------------------------------            --------------------------
>>
>>      --------------------------
>> --->|my MTA -poczta.cibet.pl |
>>      --------------------------
>>
>>
>> So it's not important for my if address 31.61.129.221 is on any rbl
>> because I'm not getting email directly from this ip. It's important for
>> me if server 89.161.182.208 (which directly connects to my mta) is in
>> any RBL
> 
> and who's MTA is 89.161.182.208?

It's not mine MTA. It is MTA used by someone on the world.

> if it's a known machine realying mail for you it *is* important if
> 31.61.129.221 is on a RBL - hence put 89.161.182.208 in trusted_networks

I'm thinking about removing all Received headers from email except added
by my MTA, storing it, sending email to spamd and restoring headers. But
it looks like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut:)



Marcin


Reply via email to