W dniu 06.05.2015 o 14:46, Kevin A. McGrail pisze: > On 5/5/2015 3:56 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote: >> W dniu 2015-05-05 o 21:47, Kevin A. McGrail pisze: >>> On 5/5/2015 3:38 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote: >>>> I'm thinking about removing all Received headers from email except >>>> added >>>> by my MTA, storing it, sending email to spamd and restoring headers. >>>> But >>>> it looks like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut:) >>> What RBL are you concerned about specifically because some RBLs do deep >>> header parsing which you can change with lastexternal? >> RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS. It looks that "lastexternal" is what I'm looking for. >> Is it possible to add '-lastexternal' to all RBL? > Different RBLs are designed differently so it's not a one size fits all > question & answer. > > CSS is designed for ISPs... http://www.spamhaus.org/css/ > > As such, a deep header parsing might be appropriate.
Hi! Thank you all for explanations, "deep header inspection" is the reason of such behavior. Good information is my configuration of SA is correct:) Marcin
