On 19.10.15 17:30, Ryan Coleman wrote:
I actually get THOUSANDS of emails a day. Most of it is spam. And not
caught by SA. And when it is put into the spam folder it is not learned.
But, hey, you know… you obviously know me better than me so why don’t you
have this back and forth publicly with yourself and keep me out of it.
I would be still carefull to train all read mail as ham... there are cases
you don't notice it's spam (some of them are hardly distinguishable), forget
to move it to spam or don't have time to do it...
P.S.: no need for reply-all on a mailing list
Habit. Besides, there’s no reply-to header rewrite on this mailing list. If I
hit reply it goes only to you
that's why there are list headers and why some MUAs support them.
On Oct 19, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
nonsense - there are list headers and if you use a broken client just remove
anything but the list-address
Wow, you really are an asshole, huh?
I looked at the headers before I said anything. Broken Client? No… Apple Mail.
There are lists where it works because it EXISTS IN THE HEADERS.
not that I like him, but he's right that mail client that is not capable of
handling mailing lists is kind of broken...
Lists should not break mail by inserting reply-to header, because it's
supposed to be inserted by a client, not by a mailing list.
and the fact that it's made by apple doesn't make it good client.
Microsoft and apple tend to screw things their way just because they are
huge companies and don't care about (even backwards) compatibility and
correctness
Speaking of learning spam… your email address will be joining the blacklist
very soon.
just be careful when blacklisting and spam-training...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.
