> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:19 -0500, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>> I dont use any ham training.Should I scan all my folders with this
>> command:
>> sa-learn --ham --mbox /home/username/mail/foldername
>>
> YES - if Bayes never gets trained on ham, how do you expect it to
> recognise the difference between ham and spam?
>
> Bayes won't start to work until it has seen 200 examples of ham and 200
> examples of spam.
thx, i started to sort the emails for a learnng process
>
>> "is the bayes-db of this user *realy* used at scan time"
>> how do i check that?
>>
> When its working you'll see BAYES_nn rules firing.
>
>> I use the procemail to pass all mail through spam assassin.
>> I use default ubuntu setup with Razors enabled.
>> It does catches spam but not the one i attached in original post.
>>
>> example mail sa headers:
>>
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
>> ip-10-254-37-89.us-west-2.compute.internal
>> X-Spam-Level: ***
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=5.0
>> tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
>> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_C
>> HECK,SPF_HELO_PASS,
>> SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn=no
>> autolearn_force=no
>> version=3.4.0
>>
> As others have said, URIBL-BLOCKED shows that the number of BL lookups
> from all the people using whatever DNS server you're using exceeds the
> free usage count for the BL server. BL servers count messages from a
> particular DNS and don't know/can't find out how many people are using
> a particular DNS server to do BL lookups. To get round that you need
> your own DNS server, configured the do recursive lookups and NOT to
> forward queries to any other DNS server.
>
> So, set up your own recursive, non-forwarding DNS server on the host
> where you're running SA. Configure that host to pass all DNS queries to
> your new DNS server by configuring /etc/resolv.conf as I and others
> have described.
>
> If you don't understand how to install and configure a DNS server and
> prefer printed material to online documents, get the O'Reilly book "DNS
> and BIND".
>
I did configure local recursive server and set both spam local.cf and
resolved.conf to point to 127.0.0.1 and I still get the blocks.
Return-Path: <peytonmed...@allenlawpa.staredoll.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on xxx
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-Spam-Report:
* -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked.
* See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
* for more information.
* [URIs: motortrend.com]
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.0000]
* 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image
>
> Martin
>
>
