On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:52:35 -0800
Marc Perkel <[email protected]> wrote:
Again - Bayes compares what matches. My filter compares what doesn't
match.
Your filter is exactly equivalent to Bayes if you do the following
things:
1) Use combinations of up to four words as tokens, instead of just
single tokens.
2) Throw out any tokens whose probability is not either 100% spam or 100% ham.
Idea (1) is probably good. We use words and word-pairs. I'm not sure the
extra storage for more than pairs is justifiable.
Personally I'd rather see SA implement *that*.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
3 days until John Moses Browning's 161st Birthday
