Am 24.01.2016 um 20:45 schrieb Shawn Bakhtiar:
On Jan 24, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Martin Gregorie <[email protected]> wrote: On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 00:07 +0530, Sarang Shrivastava wrote:I am just a newbie who has started using SA. Someone on the mailing list suggested me to use -D option. So if this option is for debugging then how do we classify it ?You don't classify it: that's SA's job. It only scores messages and sets the Yes/No flag before adding the X-Spam-* headers to the message. Nothing else. What you do with mail that SA has classified as spam is the responsibility of your additional software and/or your users. Simplest case: configure SA to add [SPAM] as the first word in the Subject header and let the users decide what to do with this mail. Next easiest: If your users' mail readers can detect spam and put it in a spam folder, enable that feature for them once you've configured SA to set whatever indicator the mail reader uses for spam identification.The best option I’ve found is to use sieve (filter) scripts (we have a default set we enable for all new users) that simply moves emails tagged as spam into a special folder
* the point is that he is analyzing *local* files * so he needs to pass eml files to spamc/spamassassin * SA adds a header "X-Spam-Flag: Yes" in case of it reached spam-score * that output needs to be parsed * that's it
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
