On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 20:52 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > * the point is that he is analyzing *local* files > NOW we know that. But, the OP's first post made it clear he hadn't even read the manpage or he'd have realised that SA's results are output by adding headers to the message. Also, he clearly had no clue about asking good questions or he'd have said what he was trying to do rather than saying (summarised) "SA doesn't do what I want. Waaaa!".
> * so he needs to pass eml files to spamc/spamassassin > * SA adds a header "X-Spam-Flag: Yes" in case of it reached spam > -score > * that output needs to be parsed > * that's it > In fact that's all anybody ever does with SA. You look at the X-Spam -Flag header to determine whether the message is spam and deal with it if it is. Some analysis or more nuanced spam disposal may want to look at the score and/or names of rules that fired, so they will also look at the X-Spam-Status header. Martin
