On Sun, 15 May 2016 18:08:31 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
> >That seems a little aggressive, IMO. > I don't think so. If you have a mail server, you don't change its DNS > records very often. Maybe, but the TTL on the DNS records has nothing to do with whether or not an address is part of a dynamic pool. I mean, you could give your dynamic addresses names that never change and set a TTL of a week, which wouldn't make the assignment of those addresses to customers any less dynamic. Regards, Dianne.
