On 24.05.16 17:49, Nick Howitt wrote:
I'm using SpamAssassin v3.3.1-3 on ClearOS 6.7 (a CentOS derivative) and I
believe it is invoked by amavis-new. I have a whitelist line in local.cf:
Please, don't use html mail in mailing lists.
From peacocks-mail.com I get:
Return-Path:
[6]<g-22286502917-22331-2200271903-1464103669...@bounce.peacocks-mail.com>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by server.mydomain.com (Cyrus v2.3.16-Fedora-RPM-2.3.16-13.v6) with
LMTPA;
Tue, 24 May 2016 16:27:53 +0100
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailserver.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9228DE8B16
for [7]<ourfam...@mydomain.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:27:53 +0100
(BST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mydomain.com
Received: from mailserver.mydomain.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (server.mydomain.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port
10024)
with ESMTP id 73FALjivwnS1 for [8]<ourfam...@mydomain.com>;
Tue, 24 May 2016 16:27:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailserver.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD76E8CB3
for [9]<ourfam...@mydomain.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:27:52 +0100
(BST)
Received: from unusquattuorsx.theta.eccluster.com
(unusquattuorsx.theta.eccluster.com [91.192.41.146])
by mailserver.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6BEE0462
for [10]<ourfam...@mydomain.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:27:52 +0100
(BST)
In this case there are no X-Spam entries, as if whitelisting completely
bypasses spamassassin but both go through amavisd-new. Can you help me
understand what is happening?
this is spamassassin, not amavis mailing list.
you should search amavis documentation and configuration to see if it was
configured to skip the mail (maybe because of its size?)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
