On Thu, 26 May 2016 12:20:35 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
you apparently mistook razor to DCC, the DCC is here to measure
bulkiness, but not (necessarily) spamminess.
On 26.05.16 09:46, Dianne Skoll wrote:
Yes, you are correct. Thanks for the clarification!
And also, just to clarify another thing: Lossy procedures are not
always bad. SpamAssassin rules, for example, are by definition lossy
but are quite effective. However, in my experience, manipulating the
data you feed into Bayes is rarely helpful and sometimes
counterproductive, because Bayes on its own is very good at picking
out what's important and what is not.
especially when it wipes off the differences between spam and ham :-)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Emacs is a complicated operating system without good text editor.
