On 5/31/2016 8:32 PM, sha...@shanew.net wrote:
Kind of a shot in the dark, but are you sure everyone is promptly
moving their spam out of the inboxes? I worry about automated
learning like this. Even then, it seems unlikely that every mail
would get tagged by bayes as likely ham.
Someone just today suggested in another thread to add the following
line in local.cf in order to get more detail on what bayes is doing
under the hood. It would provide more information for you (and us) to
go on.
add_header all Bayes
bayes=_BAYES_,N=_BAYESTC_(_BAYESTCLEARNED_-_BAYESTCHAMMY_+_BAYESTCSPAMMY_),ham=(_HAMMYTOKENS(5,short)_),
spam=(_SPAMMYTOKENS(5,short)_)
You might have to run SA directly against messages, as amavis may
throw out custom headers like that (I _know_ spamass-milter would).
Amavis only gets the score from SA. Any SA header settings are ignored.
You can add that header config to the local.cf file and then run SA on
one of the messages that got BAYES_00 to see what it's doing. You just
have to be VERY sure that you run the command as the same user that
Amavis is running as. Otherwise, your results will be totally meaningless.
--
Bowie
