On Thursday 02 June 2016 at 15:12:58, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 02.06.2016 um 15:07 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: > > On 02.06.16 14:48, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> that typically happens only when one is using a forwarding resolver > >> get it finally
As you said yourself, "typically". That's not "exclusively". > > you did not get it: > > > > there are cases where it's not caused by forwarding DNS but by getting > > much mail. > > > > just for sure: > > > > there are cases where it's not caused by forwarding DNS but by getting > > much mail. > > > > got it finally? > > i got more than you can imagine Please could you two take this unproductive posturing offlist? I'm sure everyone following this thread has now understood that URIBL_BLOCKED means you should check your DNS setup, and there have been several good suggestions about pointing people at the good documentation on how to avoid this, when the problem occurs. I don't think we need any further "I know what I'm talking about and you don't" emails, thank you both. > it's highly unlike in a proper setup that SA faces enough email to hit > the URIBL limit Once again, as you said yourself, "highly unlikely". That does not mean "impossible". Thanks, Antony (not a list moderator, just a subscriber who prefers to see useful and productive emails on lists and in the archives afterwards). -- All matter in the Universe can be placed into one of two categories: 1. Things which need to be fixed. 2. Things which need to be fixed once you've had a few minutes to play with them.
