On Thu, 26 Jan 2017, John Stimson wrote:

I am running SpamAssassin 3.4.1. It is running as a background daemon, started with:

/usr/bin/spamd -d --allow-tell

Incoming mail is accepted by postfix 3.1 and submitted via the milter interface to spamass-milter 0.40 for processing in SpamAssassin.

My Postfix installation is set up to use SASL authentication managed by dovecot for any message that does not have a local sender or recipient. This was done to allow users of my system to send mail from mobile devices which may be on cellular connections or remote WiFi networks.

Sometime around January 19th, I suddenly started having messages from authenticated users on remote networks rejected by SpamAssassin, with these test flags in the X-Spam-Status header: HELO_MISC_IP,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC

I have been running this configuration since April 2016 without having this issue before.

Just to be clear: nothing in the MTA stack got upgraded? Postfix, dovecot, spamass-milter, etc.? No SA config changes?

Any ideas about what might be going on, or how to get SpamAssassin to pass messages from authenticated senders?

Can you provide the full headers from such a message? It's possible that the authentication information is (for some reason) being incorporated in a manner that SA does not recognize.

Also post your trusted_networks and internal_networks settings.



--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 [email protected]    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a [email protected]
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Activist: Someone who gets involved.
  Unregistered Lobbyist: Someone who gets involved
       with something the MSM doesn't approve of.         -- WizardPC
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 88 more days working to pay your (average) annual US tax bill
 before you're finally working for yourself.

Reply via email to