Em Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:03:13 -0300, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net>
escreveu:
"I just felt the need to reiterate that I don't see there ever being a
T6;..."
Simple: T5.0 => T5.1 => ... => T5.9 => T7.0
hehehe :)
Another path would be T5.0 => T5.1 => ... => T5.9 => ... T5.10 ...
(supposing backward-compatility is kept besides for minor things, of
course)
Or do it the Sun way: T5.0 => T5.1 => ... => T5.4 => ... T9 :P
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
