Heh..the first release of Windows NT was v3.1, so I guess there is nothing sacred with version numbers. Not to mention Sun marketing. ;-)
I imagine once the paradigms shift enough because of new innovations/evolution of standards, a new product will have to emerge to support it. It just won't be named "Tapestry". (TapestryNT? Magic Carpet? Berber? Astroturf?) I'm talking about far into the future. I expect the T5 IOC to live well beyond the web framework portion. On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo<thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Em Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:03:13 -0300, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > escreveu: > >> "I just felt the need to reiterate that I don't see there ever being a >> T6;..." >> >> Simple: T5.0 => T5.1 => ... => T5.9 => T7.0 > > hehehe :) > > Another path would be T5.0 => T5.1 => ... => T5.9 => ... T5.10 ... > (supposing backward-compatility is kept besides for minor things, of course) > Or do it the Sun way: T5.0 => T5.1 => ... => T5.4 => ... T9 :P > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor > http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
