How many on the list would think that breaking with apache and trying a radical change (be more like a company, like SpringSource) is something that should be tried? After all being an Apache project does allow Donations or Funding directly to a respective project? like Tapestry? and i do believe that licensing concerns are bad!
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > <thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:47:07 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >>> >> One of the challenges of running Tapestry as an Apache project is >>> >> that, due to licensing concerns, a lot of the integrations are >>> >> non-starters. >>> >> I keep expecting someone to say "Hey, You can't integrate with >>> >> Hibernate! It's LGPL!". >> > >> > In this case, couldn't we host these projects somewhere else and consider >> > them officially approved in Tapestry's website? This could even be applied >> > to some projects not written by the commiters, such as tapestry-jpa, as >> long >> > as they meet the same quality criteria used to Tapestry itself. > > Quality issues are hard to gauge. > > Also, there's something good about having a suite of libraries that > are released on the same schedule with the same version number. Makes > figuring out compatibility much easier (are you listening, Hibernate?) > >> > >> > -- >> > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, >> and >> > instructor >> > Owner, software architect and developer, Ars Machina Tecnologia da >> > Informação Ltda. >> > http://www.arsmachina.com.br >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> > >> >
