On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:31:35 -0200, Andreas Fink
<fink.a...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Sorry for my hasty and not well formulated rant.
I was just thinking about the announcment of the Rails-team to switch to
Coffeescript and what an impact that has on developers and existing apps.
There is always that compromise between flexibility and high-level tools
but as the server side of Tapestry focusses so much on
flexibilty/modularity i think it would make sense to follow that route
also for the browser side.
In this case, it would be just an out-of-the-box support for a given
package that wouldn't prevent support for other similar packages. In
addition, it's quite probable that it would make it easier to add support
for other similar packages. ;)
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,
and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
