I'm pretty sure tapestry would blow JSF out of the water, just due to the architecture differences. As far as JSP, it is very hard to beat because it compiles directly to java servlet code.
On Jan 21, 2013, at 11:51 AM, "John" <j...@quivinco.com> wrote: > I see a chart comparing some framework performance with Tapestry doing very > well, but I did not see JSF on the chart. > > Does anyone know how JSF compares to Tapestry? Would it's performance be > comparable to JSP? > > John > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Bob Harner > To: Tapestry users > Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 2:54 PM > Subject: Tapestry performance > > > Hello everybody, > > I recently threw together a new page in the documentation about > Tapestry performance. (Much of it plagiarizes mailing list posts from > Howard.) > > http://tapestry.apache.org/performance-and-clustering.html > > It's really just a first draft at this point. So if anyone has any > additional tips to share about how to achieve the best performance > with a Tapestry app, no matter how small, I'd love to hear them. > Please reply here. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
