Can someone clarify why would play! be better than tapestry in this test ? On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:36:01 -0200, John <j...@quivinco.com> wrote: > > That's interesting Thiago, in the chart JSP ranked slightly better than >> Tapestry but not as well as play. >> > > Where's this chart? By the way, as far as I know, Play doesn't use JSP nor > the Servlet API. Regarding Tapestry vs JSP, Tapestry has more way more > features and way more productive, while JSP is almost bare-bones, so some > overhead is expected. > > > I think performance tests should compare complex web pages and form >> handling because trivial test cases are unlikely to stretch the frameworks >> to reveal substantial practical differences. >> > > Yep. That's also why comparing web frameworks performance is very > difficult. > > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > users-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.org<users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
