Sorry, the image was not embedded correctly. Here is the link:
http://i.imgur.com/OlnNVBn.png
(two headers before, three headers after).
Now I am examining if it's possible to move the third <td> component down
(below the other two) via css styling.
2016-06-22 8:13 GMT+02:00 Chris Poulsen <mailingl...@nesluop.dk>:
> Your post seems incomplete, so it is not clear to me, what you are trying
> to do.
>
> --
> Chris
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 8:05 AM, g kuczera <gkucz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Currently I got a request to add another visible column to the table
> (grid
> > component), but the request was for it to be placed below the rest. What
> do
> > you think the best approach would be in this case? I see three of them:
> >
> > - add the mentioned column in the *include* parameter and after
> > rendering the page move it below the others (is that even possible?)
> >
> > <t:grid t:id="casesGrid" id="casesGrid" class="regular clear"
> > source="casesDataSource" include="id, topic, date" row="currentCase"
> > pagerPosition="none">
> >
> > - I tried putting the regular <p> inside the <t:grid> with
> > currentCase.date value, but without having it in the include
> parameter, but
> > the grid ignores that and do not render the date value
> >
> > <p:idCell>${currentCase.id}</p:idCell>
> >
> > <p:topicCell>${currentCase.topic}</p:topicCell>
> >
> > <p>${currentCase.date}</p>
> >
> > - the last one would be using the loop component, and put the values
> > inside divs, which can be easily moved around - it would mean for me
> > changing the casesDataSource (extended GridDataSource) to something
> > different, because the loop source cannot be feed with it
> >
> > What do you think is possible in this case?
> >
> > Here is the concept art:
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
