-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Nick,
On 1/30/13 1:08 PM, Williams, Nick wrote: > I do not have a preferred implementation, no. I understand the > basics of JMS and how it works, but I have never actually used it > before. I do usually work with Spring Framework, but my > understanding is that it's relatively agnostic as to the underlying > implementation of JMS. > > ActiveMQ looks interesting. One concern I have is that some of the > documentation seems rather dated: [...] FWIW, David and the gang over at TomEE chose Apache Active MQ as their JMS provider. That could have been merely Apache-bias, but they did get TomEE certified for the J2EE Web Profile (not sure what version... I think 1.6). Presumably, TomEE will want to keep up-to-date when JMS 2.0 comes out, so they may be keeping their eye on JMS implementations. It might be worth a trip over to their mailing list to find out. I'm personally interested in an active JMS implementation as I'll be moving towards that space relatively soon for my own projects. I'd be glad to hear what you find out about JMS in general and Active MQ specifically. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEAREIAAYFAlEJaasACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCcsQCdGz3oub6agyK7uIVMasu8a+rv 3ncAn0EyDD3mU0gj6PJYsjoG+/WXVThQ =crSM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
